Robert Haas wrote: > I'm not really very convinced that it's a good idea to expose this > instead of just figuring out a way to parse the object identity.
That's the first thing I tried. But it's not pretty: you have to extract schema names by splitting at a period (and what if a schema name contains a period?), split out on ON for certain object types, figure out parens and argument types and names for functions and aggregates, etc. It's just not sane to try to parse such text strings. > But I expect to lose that argument. Good :-) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
