On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Ordering transactions in LSN order is very precisly the remit of the > existing logical decoding API. Any user that wishes to see a commits > in sequence can do so using that API. BDR already does this, as do > other users of the decoding API. So Slony already has access to a > useful ordering if it wishes it. We do not need to anything *on this > patch* to enable LSNs for Slony or anyone else. I don't see any reason > to provide the same facility twice, in two different ways.
Perhaps you could respond more specifically to concerns expressed upthread, like: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/blu436-smtp28b68b9312cbe5d9125441dc...@phx.gbl I don't see that as a dumb argument on the face of it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
