On 12/9/14 4:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 06:10:02PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> (For pg_upgrade you also need to do something about pg_upgrade_support, >> which is good because that is one very ugly crock.) > > FYI, pg_upgrade_support was segregated from pg_upgrade only because we > wanted separate binary and shared object build/install targets.
I think the actual reason is that the makefile structure won't let you have them both in the same directory. I don't see why you would need separate install targets. How about we move these support functions into the backend? It's not like we don't already have other pg_upgrade hooks baked in all over the place. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
