Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On 12/12/14 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think pg_upgrade should continue to have SQL scripts that create and
>> delete the SQL function definitions for these.
> That won't actually work very easily. LANGUAGE internal functions need
> to be in fmgr_builtins, and the only way to get them there is by listing
> them in pg_proc.h. (We could drop the functions in initdb, but seems
> kind of silly.)
Oh, good point.
> The functions do already check themselves that they are called in binary
> upgrade mode, so exposing them in pg_proc doesn't seem risky.
Fair enough ... binary upgrade mode is not readily accessible, right?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
