Bruce, On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:42:30AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > To get into the FAQ, it should be something that happens _frequently_, > hence FAQ.
Understood. That is why is said "for consideration." > Fact is, cygwin may not even be needed in 7.4 because we are > working on a native port. A Win32 native port in the 7.4 time frame is great news! However, I hope that the Cygwin port will not be deprecated. There are compelling reasons to still have a Cygwin PostgreSQL port just like there is with Python, Perl, Vim, Emacs, etc. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind being put out of the Cygwin PostgreSQL support business... :,) Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
