On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > I understand, but I think "pg_rewind" is likely to be misleading to many > users who will say "but I don't want just to rewind". > > I'm not wedded to the name I suggested, but I think we should look at > possible alternative names. We do have experience of misleading names > causing confusion (e.g. "initdb").
FWIW, pg_rewind sounds pretty good to me. But maybe I'm just not understanding what the use case for this, apart from rewinding? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
