2015-01-26 23:29 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com>: > On 1/26/15 4:17 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> Any way to reduce the code duplication between the array and >> non-array versions? Maybe factor out the operator caching code? >> >> >> I though about it - but there is different checks, different result >> processing, different result type. >> >> I didn't find any readable and reduced form :( >> > > Yeah, that's why I was thinking specifically of the operator caching > code... isn't that identical? That would at least remove a dozen lines...
It is only partially identical - I would to use cache for array_offset, but it is not necessary for array_offsets .. depends how we would to modify current API to support externally cached data. Regards Pavel > > -- > Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting > Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com >
