On 1/27/15 4:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2015-01-26 23:29 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com <mailto:jim.na...@bluetreble.com>>:On 1/26/15 4:17 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: Any way to reduce the code duplication between the array and non-array versions? Maybe factor out the operator caching code? I though about it - but there is different checks, different result processing, different result type. I didn't find any readable and reduced form :( Yeah, that's why I was thinking specifically of the operator caching code... isn't that identical? That would at least remove a dozen lines... It is only partially identical - I would to use cache for array_offset, but it is not necessary for array_offsets .. depends how we would to modify current API to support externally cached data.
Externally cached data? -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
