Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > I'm going to mark this back to 'waiting on author' in case there's > > something material that I've missed which you can clarify. I had > > started this review thinking to help move it along but after re-reading > > the thread and thinking about it for a bit, I came around to the other > > side and therefore think it should probably be rejected. We certainly > > appreciate the effort, of course. > > Re-reading this thread there are 3 perplexed opinions from three > different committers, and nobody pleading in favor of this patch > except me, so let's simply mark this as rejected and move on.
Well I also don't really like the existing behavior but it's not a big issue and so I'm OK with letting go. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
