On 7 August 2015 at 14:24, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:00:44PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > * 2014-12-08 [519b075] Simon ..: Use GetSystemTimeAsFileTime directly in
> win32
> >   2014-12-08 [8001fe6] Simon ..: Windows: use
> GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime if ..
> >   Timer resolution isn't a unimportant thing for people using explain?
>
> This all seemed very internals-only, e.g.:
>
>     On most Windows systems this change will actually have no significant
> effect on
>     timestamp resolution as the system timer tick is typically between 1ms
> and 15ms
>     depending on what timer resolution currently running applications have
>     requested. You can check this with clockres.exe from sysinternals.
> Despite the
>     platform limiation this change still permits capture of finer
> timestamps where
>     the system is capable of producing them and it gets rid of an
> unnecessary
>     syscall.
>
> Was I wrong?
>
>
This does have a user visible change. Timestamps are now likely to have 6
digits after the decimal point, if they're on a version of windows which
supports GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime();

Master:

postgres=# select now();
              now
-------------------------------
 2015-08-09 01:14:01.959645+12
(1 row)

9.4.4
postgres=# select now();
            now
----------------------------
 2015-08-09 01:15:09.783+12
(1 row)

Regards

David Rowley

--
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to