On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 09:02:09PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > With regard to the point about the number of buffer mappings: This has > forced peoples sites down. People have found this out themselves and > patched postgres. That's an entirely different league.
I was not aware of the magnitude of this issue. 9.5 release note item attached and applied. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml new file mode 100644 index 0786a20..bbaa886 *** a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml --- b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml *************** FIXME: Add Andres *** 463,468 **** --- 463,482 ---- </para> </listitem> + <listitem> + <para> + <!-- + 2014-10-02 [3acc10c9] Robert..: Increase the number of buffer mapping partitio.. + --> + Increase the number of buffer mapping partitions (Amit Kapila, + Andres Freund, Robert Haas) + </para> + + <para> + This improves performance for highly concurrent workloads. + </para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> </sect4>
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers