On Fri, Aug  7, 2015 at 09:02:09PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> With regard to the point about the number of buffer mappings: This has
> forced peoples sites down. People have found this out themselves and
> patched postgres. That's an entirely different league.

I was not aware of the magnitude of this issue.  9.5 release note item
attached and applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 0786a20..bbaa886
*** a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
*************** FIXME: Add Andres
*** 463,468 ****
--- 463,482 ----
         </para>
        </listitem>
  
+       <listitem>
+        <para>
+ <!--
+ 2014-10-02 [3acc10c9] Robert..: Increase the number of buffer mapping partitio..
+ -->
+         Increase the number of buffer mapping partitions (Amit Kapila,
+         Andres Freund, Robert Haas)
+        </para>
+ 
+        <para>
+         This improves performance for highly concurrent workloads.
+        </para>
+       </listitem>
+ 
       </itemizedlist>
  
      </sect4>
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to