Arthur Silva <arthur...@gmail.com> writes: > Are we landing pg_tgrm 1.2 in pg 9.5?
No, we aren't. And please don't quote 70 lines of unrelated stuff before making your point. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers