Arthur Silva <arthur...@gmail.com> writes:
> Are we landing pg_tgrm 1.2 in pg 9.5?

No, we aren't.

And please don't quote 70 lines of unrelated stuff before making
your point.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to