On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> On 2015-09-04 16:26, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
>>
>> Attached patch is implementing this. It doesn't pretend to be fully
>> correct implementation, but it should be enough for proof the concept.
>> In this patch access method exposes another function: amvalidate. It
>> takes data structure representing opclass and throws error if it finds
>> it invalid.
>> This method is used on new opclass definition (alter operator family
>> etc. are not yet implemented but planned). Also, there is SQL function
>> validate_opclass(oid) which is used in regression tests.
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
> This is starting to look good
>

Thanks!


> However I don't like the naming differences between validate_opclass and
> amvalidate. If you expect that the current amvalidate will only be used for
> opclass validation then it should be renamed accordingly.
>

I'm not yet sure if we need separate validation of opfamilies.

Also GetIndexAmRoutine should check the return type of the amhandler.


Will be fixed.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Reply via email to