On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2015-09-07 20:56, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com >> >> However I don't like the naming differences between validate_opclass >> and amvalidate. If you expect that the current amvalidate will only >> be used for opclass validation then it should be renamed accordingly. >> >> >> I'm not yet sure if we need separate validation of opfamilies. >> >> > Well either the amvalidate or the validate_opclass should be renamed IMHO, > depending on which way the checking goes (one interface for everything with > generic name or multiple interfaces for multiple validations). Yes, I agree with you about naming. I'm not sure about separate validation of opfamilies independent of its naming. I'd like to get any arguments/advises about it. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
