On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is > somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be > defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion > constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a > patch for that.
Makes sense to me. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
