On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita > <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is >> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be >> defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion >> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a >> patch for that. > > Makes sense to me.
Me, too. Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
