On 2015/10/03 5:57, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion
constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a
patch for that.
Makes sense to me.
Me, too. Committed.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
