On 2015-12-04 21:55:29 -0500, Noah Misch wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:03:21PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > > Sorry, but I really just want to see these changes as iterative patches > > ontop of 9.5/HEAD instead of this process. I won't revert the reversion > > if you push it anyway, but I think it's a rather bad idea. > > I hear you.
Not just me. > I evaluated your request and judged that the benefits you cited > did not make up for the losses I cited. Should you wish to change my mind, > your best bet is to find defects in the commits I proposed. If I introduced > juicy defects, that discovery would lend much weight to your conjectures. I've absolutely no interest in "proving you wrong". And my desire to review patches that are in a, in my opinion, barely reviewable format is pretty low as well. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
