+1 On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> > wrote: > >> > Ripping it out and replacing it monolithically will not > >> > change that; it will only make the detailed history harder to > >> > reconstruct, and I *will* want to reconstruct it. > >> > >> What's something that might happen six months from now and lead you to > inspect > >> master or 9.5 multixact.c between 4f627f8 and its revert? > > > > "Hey, what has happened to multixact.c lately? I'm investigating a bug, > > and I wonder if it already has been fixed?", "Uh, what was the problem > > with that earlier large commit?", "Hey, what has changed between beta2 > > and the final release?"... > > Quite. > > I can't believe we're still having this silly discussion. Can we please > move on? > > -- > Peter Geoghegan > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Bert Desmet 0477/305361
