On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> > Ripping it out and replacing it monolithically will not >> > change that; it will only make the detailed history harder to >> > reconstruct, and I *will* want to reconstruct it. >> >> What's something that might happen six months from now and lead you to >> inspect >> master or 9.5 multixact.c between 4f627f8 and its revert? > > "Hey, what has happened to multixact.c lately? I'm investigating a bug, > and I wonder if it already has been fixed?", "Uh, what was the problem > with that earlier large commit?", "Hey, what has changed between beta2 > and the final release?"...
Quite. I can't believe we're still having this silly discussion. Can we please move on? -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
