On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I, for one, agree with this position. > > Well, I, for one, find it frustrating. It seems pretty unhelpful to > bring this up only after the code has already been written. The first > post on this thread was on May 10th. The first version of the patch > was posted on June 16th. This position was first articulated on > September 15th.
Really, what do we have to lose at this point? It's not very difficult to do what Andres proposes. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
