2016-10-02 12:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>:

> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release
> after release
> >
> > For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that.
> >
> > In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing
> > ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes
> > recoverable today then go for it.
>
> +1.
>

+1

Pavel


> --
> Michael
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

Reply via email to