On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2016-10-02 12:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release >> >> after release >> > >> > For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that. >> > >> > In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing >> > ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes >> > recoverable today then go for it. >> >> +1. > > +1
And moved to next CF to make it breath. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
