On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I am sorry, I disagree. Proposed form is hard readable. Is not possible to
> simply copy/paste.
Why do you care? You can use \sf if you want to copy&paste the
function code.
> I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.
My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+
altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output
in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking
anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing.
I agree with everything Alvaro just said.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
