On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: >> On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+ >>> altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output >>> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it >>> out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking >>> anyone's scripts, that's for sure. >>> >>> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to >>> footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing. > >> I agree with everything Alvaro just said. > > Well, alternatively, can we get a consensus for doing that? People > did speak against removing PL source code from \df+ altogether, but > maybe they're willing to reconsider if the alternative is doing nothing. > > Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing...
Let's remove it and move on then. By looking again at this thread and particularly https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160926190618.gh5...@tamriel.snowman.net (thanks Stephen for the summary) that's where we are heading to. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
