Hi 2016-10-08 23:46 GMT+02:00 Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com>:
> On 10/3/16 3:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> I am feeling consensus on removing source of PL from \dt+. There is >> partial consensus on saving this field (renamed) for C and internal >> language. I am not sure about consensus about \sf enhancing. >> > > FWIW, I'm completely in favor of ditching PL source code. I'm neutral on C > and internal. > here is a patch Regards Pavel > -- > Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX > Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL > Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com > 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461 >
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/describe.c b/src/bin/psql/describe.c index 6275a68..f03f547 100644 --- a/src/bin/psql/describe.c +++ b/src/bin/psql/describe.c @@ -455,10 +455,12 @@ describeFunctions(const char *functypes, const char *pattern, bool verbose, bool printACLColumn(&buf, "p.proacl"); appendPQExpBuffer(&buf, ",\n l.lanname as \"%s\"" - ",\n p.prosrc as \"%s\"" + ",\n CASE\n" + " WHEN l.lanname IN ('c','internal') THEN p.prosrc\n" + " END as \"%s\"" ",\n pg_catalog.obj_description(p.oid, 'pg_proc') as \"%s\"", gettext_noop("Language"), - gettext_noop("Source code"), + gettext_noop("Reference name"), gettext_noop("Description")); }
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers