On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Urk. That sounds like a scary thing to back-patch. The fact that the > buildfarm has reported no problems is good as far as it goes, but user > environments can be expected to be considerably more diverse than the > buildfarm. I wouldn't mind giving users the option to select unnamed > POSIX semas, but I don't think there's any guarantee that that's 100% > certain to work every place where the current implementation works - > and if not, then people will upgrade to the latest minor release and > everything will completely stop working.
Potential risks involving minor upgrades are far higher than the risks involved by systemd, so -1 for a backpatch seen from here. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
