On 12/7/16 9:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Even with that change, dynamic shared memory is still vulnerable to be >> removed. > Really? I thought we concluded that it is safe because it is detectably > attached to running processes.
The DSM implementation uses POSIX shared memory, which doesn't have an attachment count like SysV shared memory. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
