> Potential risks involving minor upgrades are far higher than the risks > involved by systemd, so -1 for a backpatch seen from here.
As long as we would have a compile time switch to enable/disable the back-patched feature, it seems it would be acceptable. In the worst case, the back-patching could bring disasters, but in that case packagers could turn off the switch and ship updated version of packages. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
