David Bowen <dmb0...@gmail.com> writes:
> If the intent of the test is to compare strings, you should be using ne not
> !=.

Sure.  We were just confused as to how it had ever appeared to work.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to