David Bowen <dmb0...@gmail.com> writes: > If the intent of the test is to compare strings, you should be using ne not > !=.
Sure. We were just confused as to how it had ever appeared to work. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers