On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>
> Hm, but what of the "null" value? Also, I get
>
> $ perl -e 'use warnings; use Test::More; ok("2017-01-01" != "null", "ok");'
> Argument "null" isn't numeric in numeric ne (!=) at -e line 1.
> Argument "2017-01-01" isn't numeric in numeric ne (!=) at -e line 1.
> ok 1 - ok
>
It declares the test as "passed", right? I am not saying that's a correct
behaviour, but that's why we didn't catch the problem earlier. May be its a
bug in the Test module?
If I add a non-numeric prefix to LHS string, test fails.
$ perl -e 'use warnings; use Test::More; ok("Fri 2017-46" != "null", "ok");'
Argument "null" isn't numeric in numeric ne (!=) at -e line 1.
Argument "Fri 2017-46" isn't numeric in numeric ne (!=) at -e line 1.
not ok 1 - ok
# Failed test 'ok'
# at -e line 1.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
