Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deola...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm, but what of the "null" value? Also, I get
>>
>> $ perl -e 'use warnings; use Test::More; ok("2017-01-01" != "null", "ok");'
>> Argument "null" isn't numeric in numeric ne (!=) at -e line 1.
>> Argument "2017-01-01" isn't numeric in numeric ne (!=) at -e line 1.
>> ok 1 - ok
> It declares the test as "passed", right?
Oh! So it does. That is one darn weird behavior of the != operator.
> I am not saying that's a correct
> behaviour, but that's why we didn't catch the problem earlier.
Check. Mystery solved.
There's still the point that we're not actually exercising this script
in the buildfarm ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
