Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>> Whether the voters recognized that fact at the time I would have to concur
>>> that if we are going to change from xlog to wal we should be all-in. If
>>> you want to vote to reject putting the whole camel in the tent I would say
>>> its a vote for reverting the change that put the camel's nose in there in
>>> the first place.
>> WTF.
> I think that response is unwarranted. I happen to agree entirely with
> his position.
Me three. If we're changing this at all, we should try to eliminate
"xlog" from user-visible names and docs altogether. I was okay with the
proposal to have some redundant names in place for awhile, and I'm equally
okay with not having any; but not with being permanently schizophrenic
on the point.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
