On 2017-01-28 08:47:03 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 1/26/17 2:05 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> I do not think it can be right to rename the directory and not > >> anything else. > > > > I think this is the root of the confusion. > > > > A lot of people apparently consented to renaming pg_xlog with the > > understanding that that's it, whereas other people understood it as > > consensus for renaming everything. > > > > You really have (at least) three options here: > > > > 1. Rename nothing > > 2. Rename directory only > > 3. Rename everything > > > > and you need to count the votes of each pair separately. > > 4. Rename everything with aliases. > > I would vote for 4., or 3. for consistency if 4. is not an eligible choice.
2, 4, 1, 3 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
