On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I'd rather have a --quiet mode instead. If you're running it by hand, > you're likely to omit the switch, whereas when writing the cron job > you're going to notice lack of switch even before you let the job run > once.
Well, that might've been a better way to design it, but changing it now would break backward compatibility and I'm not really sure that's a good idea. Even if it is, it's a separate concern from whether or not in the less-quiet mode we should point out that we're waiting for a checkpoint on the server side. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
