On 03/13/2017 07:21 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 03/13/2017 12:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >>> On 2017-03-11 22:14:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> This looks generally sane to me, although I'm not very happy about folding >>>> the "$(MKDIR_P) output_iso" call into pg_isolation_regress_check --- that >>>> seems weird and unlike the way it's done for the regular regression test >>>> case. >>> Yea, not super happy about that either - alternatively we could fold it >>> into pg_regress. >> Yeah, teaching pg_regress to auto-create the --temp-instance directory >> seems perfectly sane from here. > > w.r.t. $subject, I thought it might be useful to get some recent stats > from the buildfarm. Results are below. The bin checks dwarf everything > else. Upgrade checks and isolation check are other items of significant > cost. Upgrade checks could be significantly shortened if we could avoid > rerunning the regression tests.
Sorry for line wrapping. Better formatted here: <https://gist.github.com/adunstan/fbbdfe646427710233ecb67569665de9> cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
