> What is the reason the new patch does not mention of violating rows > when a new partition overlaps with default? > Is it because more than one row could be violating the condition? >
This is because, for reporting the violating error, I had to function ExecBuildSlotValueDescription() public. Per Amit's comment I have removed this change and let the overlapping error without row contains. I think this is analogus to other functions that are throwing violation error but are not local to execMain.c. Regards, Jeevan Ladhe
