On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > In summary, we're currently attaching the use of SortSupport to the > wrong thing. We're treating this UTF-16 business as something that > implies a broad OS/platform restriction, when in fact it should be > treated as implying a restriction for one particular collation > provider only (a collation provider that happens to be built into > Windows, but isn't really special to us). > > Attached patch shows what I'm getting at. This is untested, since I > don't use Windows. Proceed with caution.
This is currently a v10 open item, but I think it doesn't qualify for that treatment. It's merely an opportunity for optimization, albeit an attractively-simple one. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
