Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would be interesting is a CREATE OR REPLACE functionality for
> prepared cursors, where you could ask for it to be prepared, but if it
> already existed, it would do nothing, or something like that.

I don't think you could call that CREATE OR REPLACE, because (if it's
supposed to be efficient) it *wouldn't* replace.  In any case I think
apps would prefer to avoid the overhead of even issuing such a command.
If you approach it that way, you're adding some number of additional
SQL commands to each pooled transaction, which seems to defeat the
purpose of pre-preparing commands.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to