--On Monday, September 01, 2003 13:11:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Larry Rosenman wrote:


--On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>> Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it's true, but in
>> practice why would an OS have some *_r but have only non-thread-safe
>> versions of others?
>
> Oh, interesting.  So you are saying that if the OS supports threads,
> then we use the *_r if they have them, and assume the non *_r functions
> are already thread-safe if they don't.  Interesting.
>
> That seems to be what we have on Unixware, and on BSD/OS I have some
> *_r functions but not others, but they are all threadsafe, so your plan
> works there too.
UnixWare's Kernel is threaded, and I assume anything in libc is
threadsafe  unless
told otherwise.

What? You said Unixware needs getpwuid_r. And this has nothing to do with whether the kernel is threaded.
right, getpwuid is not threadsafe, so we use the provided getpwuid_r.





--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to