Greg Stark writes:
> Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it's true, but in practice
> why would an OS have some *_r but have only non-thread-safe versions of
> others?
The question is whether configure can reliably identify whether various
*_r functions exist. I think it can't. For example, they could be in a
separate library that we don't know about.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
