Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I believe we could make
>> it a good deal more robust if both the opening and closing markers
>> (whatever they are) are required to stand alone on a line.
>>
> Hard to detect whitespace might trip things up. I wish I had a $ for
> every time that has made my life difficult.
I could accept a definition that allowed trailing whitespace on the same
line as the marker, but not any other visible characters.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
