Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe > then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less > as possible.
This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
