Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:37:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't see any way to avoid that, though, since we cannot change the
>> relfilenode value for a shared index.
> What about creating a separate filenode anyway and renaming the files
> afterwards? It would not be an atomic operation anyway, but it would be
> better than the current setup IMHO.
I think it would be difficult to persuade the buffer manager and storage
manager to work with this; from their point of view you'd be moving a
relation underneath them. I doubt it's really worth the trouble; how
often do you need to reindex a shared catalog?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
