Tom Lane wrote: > > What about creating a separate filenode anyway and renaming the files > > afterwards? It would not be an atomic operation anyway, but it would be > > better than the current setup IMHO. > > I think it would be difficult to persuade the buffer manager and storage > manager to work with this; from their point of view you'd be moving a > relation underneath them. I doubt it's really worth the trouble; how > often do you need to reindex a shared catalog?
The point I missed originally is that he is talking about shared catalogs, not system catalogs, which work fine in CVS. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
