> Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > FWIW, I've got a threaded version of the WIN32_DEV branch more or less > > "running" (it is a terrible hack job, so NO, no patches... yet :-), as a > > proof of concept. Still a work in progress (ok, I've qualified it enough), > > but it is showing enough promise to convince me that threading is the way to > > go for the Win32 port. > > How are you dealing with the issue of wanting some static variables to > be per-thread and others not? > > regards, tom lane
To be perfectly honest, I'm still trying to familiarize myself with the code sufficiently well so that I can tell which variables need to be per-thread and which are shared (and, in turn, which of these need to be protected from concurrent access). So, in short, I'm not dealing with the issue (and, hence, it is only "running" in the very loosest sense of the word). Unfortunately, I'm not yet even in a position to propose a reasonable model, let alone one that'd play well with the existing code base. Perhaps some time soon, hopefully... (I really want to get involved in this.) Cheers, Claudio --- WE HAVE MOVED - PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW CONTACT DETAILS: THE BASEMENT, 33 EWELL STREET, BALMAIN NSW 2041 TEL: +61 2 9555 1544 FAX: +61 2 9555 6911 Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
