Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> How are you dealing with the issue of wanting some static variables to
>> be per-thread and others not?
> To be perfectly honest, I'm still trying to familiarize myself with the code
> sufficiently well so that I can tell which variables need to be per-thread
> and which are shared (and, in turn, which of these need to be protected from
> concurrent access).
Well, the first-order approximation would be to duplicate the current
fork semantics: *all* static variables are per-thread, and should be
copied from the parent thread at thread creation. If there is some
reasonably non-invasive way to do that, we'd have a long leg up on the
problem.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
