On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:03:03 -0400 (AST)
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>
> > Which brings me to another question .. has anybody considered using
> > subversion instead of CVS ?
>
> Why? not that I'm for a chance from something that isn't broken, but
> what advantages does subversion give us over what we already have?
Subversion has lots of "little" benefits, but nothing that would be
a major incentive to switch. The biggest benefits I can think of
of the top of my head are:
* Commits are actually atomic
* protocol sends diffs in both directions which speeds up everything
* branching and tagging are cheap constant time operations
* the time it takes to make changes is based on the size of the
change, not the size of the project
* whole directories are versioned not just files. So for example
if you for some reason wanted to rename src/backend/bootstrap.c
to src/backend/bootup.c you wouldn't lose your revision history
information. Same thing goes for complete reorganizations of the
file layouts.
* You can checkout "parts" of a project so if you need to fix a
bug in 7.3.6's src/backend/ you only have to transfer that portion
to you.
* cvs diff ( well svn diff ) can be done offline. Same with 'status'
which shows you your local modifications and 'revert' which reverts
your changes back to your last checkout/update/etc.
* Revisions numbers are repository wide instead of by file. You can
refer to revision #14328 on hackers and everyone knows exactly what
you are talking about and can switch their working copies to it
easily ( svn switch -r 14328 ). It's sort of like having a tag
for every commit made to the repository.
It does have some downsides that I have found, most notibly that the
size of your sources you have in your working copy are essentially
doubled. There is a copy in your .svn directory that allows the
offline status, diff, and revert commands to work.
---------------------------------
Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://frank.wiles.org
---------------------------------
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
