Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> We should also think about what exactly we mean by "feature freeze". > > > As I remember, feature freeze means no new features, just fixes, and > > beta means release of the first beta that we want for wide testing. > > I guess I wasn't clear: what I was asking for was some discussion about > the criteria we should use for advancing to each of those phases. In > particular it's not real clear what "just fixes" should be interpreted > to allow for. The remaining work for Win32 could all be called "just > fixes" since it will not add any user-visible "features".
I assume "just fixes" is for bugs not known when going into feature freeze, meaning bugs found during testing. If there are significant missing parts going into feature freeze, I think you just abandon the feature and rip it out or disable it. We have done that in the past. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
