Why is it our responsibility to ensure that though?  Shouldn't the
developer (or group of developers) responsible for the
PL/interface/extension be responsible for that?

Let's use plPHP as an example here ... I'm going to guess that it supports
PHP4, which is the 'standard' right now ... what about PHP5?  If not, what
happens in 3 months if/when that support is added?  Do ppl using PHP5 have
to wait until the next release of PostgreSQL before they can use it?



Actually this is a pretty good example. Yes right now it supports PHP4, it will support PHP5 when PHP5 is ready.
And of course, no they would not have to wait. They could download and patch against the current
source tree...


The thing is, whether as part of core, or as a seperate project, *any*
pl/interface/extension has to be maintained in order to be in sync ... if
done as a seperate  project, in parallel with core, it is at least
possible to release on their own timelines in order to correct bugs, or
add features ... as part of core, new features/bug fixes have to wait for
all of core to be released ...



Well actually no, because of the above mentioned. Even if plPHP is on pgFoundry... there is no
reason why a README couldn't be included in the src/pl/plphp directory that says: look here
for the latest release etc...




Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend




--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to